|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Self-defense in Broader Context
KOPEČNÝ, Roman
This thesis deals with the question of just and unjust violence and also compares approach to the just violence today and in the past. It presents comparison of systems of if-conception self-defense and MS-1 self-defense which comes from sindefendology. From this comparison is clear, why it is necessary to refuse all so called if-conceptions self-defense (jujitsu, aikijitsu, karate, kenjitsu or other similar systems). The two main sources of this thesis are sindefendology (science of self-defense) and Christian ethics. The criteria for ethical justification are following: St. Thomas Aquinas's Summa theologiae, Catechism of theCatholic Church and real possibilities of attacked person to defense (with regard to dangers, which come from the situation). It is necessary to distinguish between self-defensive and self-protective situations. This distinction helps to comprehend the nature of combat situation, and therefore also to choose the ethical acceptable actions on time. There are described some cases which shows importance of the knowledge of sindefendology about real possibilities of attacked person. Course of justice without the knowledge of sindefendology and ethics can be unjust for attacked man.
|
|
|
Self-defence And Its Ethical Aspects
KOPEČNÝ, Roman
This work deals with self-defence as objectively possible, morally obligatory and legally permissible. It is based on sindefendology, the scientific discipline of self-defence, and Christian ethics. It explains the need of sindefendology base, and the necessity of rejecting all the if-concepts of ``self-defence`` (jujitsu, aikijitsu, karate, kenjitsu, or systems resulting from them). Ethical justification is assessed on the basis of the Summa Theological by St. Thomas Aquinas, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the defence options of the assaulted and possible danger as a result. It is essential as well as useful to distinguish between situations of self- -defence and self-protection, as only this division allows the defender to identify the nature of the combat situation, and the acceptable ethical reaction before having been placed into the serious time pressure.
|
guest ::
